Hello guys,
I was hoping to get some suggestions out of this thread.
We host several Rails apps using an Apache/Haproxy/Mongrel stack.
I have been checking to see if litespeed is a good replacement for our rails hosting needs. So far I have been impressed with the ease and administration of LSWS. It seems that if this works out we can completely the entire stack with LSWS.
However, I am finding it a roughly a third slower then my apache/H/M stack. I figured it would have something to do with my configuration.
Any advice would be much appreciated
Cheers,
Nathan C
For my environment, I have:
-------------------------------
HARDWARE
-------------------------------
2 servers with:
model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor
cpu MHz : 2.4
memory : 1gig
-------------------------------
GENERAL -> Ruby on Rails
-------------------------------
Rails Environment: Production
Max Connections: 100
Environment: LSAPI_MAX_REQS=1000
LSAPI_MAX_IDLE=60
Connection Keepalive Timeout: 60
Response Buffering: No
Back Log: 50
Run On Start Up: Yes
Max Idle Time: 300
Priority: 3
Memory Soft Limit (bytes): 350M
Memory Hard Limit (bytes): 400M
Process Soft Limit: 300
Process Hard Limit: 400
-------------------------------
GENERAL -> Tuning
-------------------------------
-- Connection --
Max Connections: 2000
Connection Timeout (secs): 300
Max Keep-Alive Requests: 1000
Smart Keep-Alive: No
Keep-Alive Timeout (secs): 5
Send Buffer Size (bytes): 0
Receive Buffer Size (bytes): 0
I/O Event Dispatcher: best (All platforms)
Max Cached Small File Size (bytes): 4096
Total Small File Cache Size (bytes): 20M
Max MMAP File Size (bytes): 256K
Total MMAP Cache Size (bytes): 40M
-- Request/Response --
Max Request URL Length (bytes): 8192
Max Request Header Size (bytes): 16380
Max Request Body Size (bytes): 10M
Max Dynamic Response Header Size (bytes): 4K
Max Dynamic Response Body Size (bytes): 10M
I was hoping to get some suggestions out of this thread.
We host several Rails apps using an Apache/Haproxy/Mongrel stack.
I have been checking to see if litespeed is a good replacement for our rails hosting needs. So far I have been impressed with the ease and administration of LSWS. It seems that if this works out we can completely the entire stack with LSWS.
However, I am finding it a roughly a third slower then my apache/H/M stack. I figured it would have something to do with my configuration.
Any advice would be much appreciated
Cheers,
Nathan C
For my environment, I have:
-------------------------------
HARDWARE
-------------------------------
2 servers with:
model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor
cpu MHz : 2.4
memory : 1gig
-------------------------------
GENERAL -> Ruby on Rails
-------------------------------
Rails Environment: Production
Max Connections: 100
Environment: LSAPI_MAX_REQS=1000
LSAPI_MAX_IDLE=60
Connection Keepalive Timeout: 60
Response Buffering: No
Back Log: 50
Run On Start Up: Yes
Max Idle Time: 300
Priority: 3
Memory Soft Limit (bytes): 350M
Memory Hard Limit (bytes): 400M
Process Soft Limit: 300
Process Hard Limit: 400
-------------------------------
GENERAL -> Tuning
-------------------------------
-- Connection --
Max Connections: 2000
Connection Timeout (secs): 300
Max Keep-Alive Requests: 1000
Smart Keep-Alive: No
Keep-Alive Timeout (secs): 5
Send Buffer Size (bytes): 0
Receive Buffer Size (bytes): 0
I/O Event Dispatcher: best (All platforms)
Max Cached Small File Size (bytes): 4096
Total Small File Cache Size (bytes): 20M
Max MMAP File Size (bytes): 256K
Total MMAP Cache Size (bytes): 40M
-- Request/Response --
Max Request URL Length (bytes): 8192
Max Request Header Size (bytes): 16380
Max Request Body Size (bytes): 10M
Max Dynamic Response Header Size (bytes): 4K
Max Dynamic Response Body Size (bytes): 10M