Hi,
In one my server have about 1000 domain with Litespeed server load on WHM about 2.xx to 3.xx stable at 2.x.
With apache load about 3.xx to 4.xx but access web eg wordpress faster then Litespeed + ls-cache or without ls-cache.
After all page get cached speed are same, but for "Time To First Byte" and first access apache win. I use standar Litespeed config.
- Total processors: 32 E5-2620v4
- Litespeed Web Host Professional (2-Worker) License (with LSCache Standard)
- 64GB DDR4 RAM
- 2 x 1TB SSD
I am frustrated with litespeed because at an expensive license price it does not provide anything different.
What do you think?
In one my server have about 1000 domain with Litespeed server load on WHM about 2.xx to 3.xx stable at 2.x.
With apache load about 3.xx to 4.xx but access web eg wordpress faster then Litespeed + ls-cache or without ls-cache.
After all page get cached speed are same, but for "Time To First Byte" and first access apache win. I use standar Litespeed config.
- Total processors: 32 E5-2620v4
- Litespeed Web Host Professional (2-Worker) License (with LSCache Standard)
- 64GB DDR4 RAM
- 2 x 1TB SSD
I am frustrated with litespeed because at an expensive license price it does not provide anything different.
What do you think?
