Search results

It 's a never ending story with you..... As you are not ready to complete your knowledge it doesn't make sense to tell you what ever.

No, you are completely wrong. Learn what ESI is good for and you will get a better understanding why a Guest Mode could help to speed up page loading time, but in case of OpenCart there is no need for it.

This is what @Germont would like to see added in the cache plugin for OC: https://blog.litespeedtech.com/2021/06/01/guest-mode-for-wordpress-in-lscwp-v4-0/

This all has nothing to do with what @Germont asked for!

Additional information: Guest Mode in OC settings (not plugin settings) and each other online shop application means, that users must not create an account to buy items.

"Seperate View for Logged-in Users" has nothing to with a Guest Mode to get the advantage of a different cache behaviour. The meaning of "Guest Mode" in cache plugin to get faster page load is different to the login status of a user that is not logged in and can't be compared.

@Germont If you have OpenLiteSpeed instead of LSWS you won't get big advantage from Guest Mode in Open Cart, because ESI must be disabled on first page request, but OLS has no ESI support. This must not be a disadvantage if you have OLS. In this case you already have a Guest Mode and not only...

If you have Wordpress use LScache plugin support at Wordpress Support. https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/litespeed-cache/

If you have OLS you better should use OLS Support. This forum is for LSWS. https://forum.openlitespeed.org/

definitely NOT! An old PHP version or missing opcode doesn't cause a sleepy (dead?) server like yours.

Yes, I did, but no the main site doesn't load fine or fast. It loads only fast if a page is cached. Loading a page that is not cached takes almost the time as loading of sitemap file.

Upgrade your server or use one with better performance.

Sitemap doesn't matter. Your server is the problem.

Problem is not the sitemap. The problem is caused by the server itself. Performance of the server is insufficient to run a website. Each request of a uncached URL takes too much time and that's why the cache rebuild seems not to work.

LiteSpeed offers its own HTTP compression, but on server level not on application level. This can be gzip or br. In both cases it's the same if gzip is enabled on application level, but you better should use gzip/br compression on server level. This is because if gzip is enabled on application...

First of all and this you surely know is, that LScache is a HTTP cache. That means, that every php based file/URL is cached if it is part of the request. The result of this cache is the generated output of a request. This is the basic function of a HTTP cache. If LScache is enabled by a single...

Each cache plugin is different and each plugin has different functions, so I don't know exactly why gzip has been disabled. But you can check if gzip is still running. Open developer console in browser and check http headers of the main document. If there is a header: content-encoding: gzip or...

Why to waste resources if there is no advantage? You have a shared hosting with very limited resources, but you want to warmup cache for bots for 8.000 items?! Again, you don't get any advantage for whatever. Save resources for things you better should use for selling. Knock Knock! Is anybody...

No, never ever! Google bot doesn't respect session cookies, but it isn't completely excluded, that Google accepts cookies. Anyway, why should bots support cookies and what should it good for related to LScache?! If you set nocache for bots and if you place this rewrite rule on top nothing else...

But beware of using the posted code. The publisher of this code seems not to have much practical experience with LiteSpeed and LScache. You will need a lot more of code to get no troubles.