That would solve 1 out of about 6 problems and would ruin the flow and conversion that I have going. I'm not looking for half measures I'm looking to fix the route issues I face and I'm happy to pay to have that done if standard module development doesn't address it.
I'm not sure why the remedy isn't a code solution to make it compatible with journal rather than putting a bandage over a gunshot wound and hoping it heals, only for it to cause you huge problems down the line with an infection.
This solution doesn't solve the issue of the fact this module cannot get a single cache right on the current setup and is showing customer data to sessions that are not even in relation. Its showing me a cached version when I log out...
...It just comes across amateur.
Edit: just want to be clear I'm not calling anyone here amateur, the point I am making is I am coming from a working cache product that does a very good job.. albeit it for guests only, has all of the minification and page speed goodies and a CDN and I get 92/100 page speed.
When you find that lscache has a plugin and you look at the release log and find it is compatible with journal, to then find out it seems (at least in my case) to be riddled with problems, it does come across a little amateur.
I really do think litespeed is a great technology and I'm excited for it, I mean its free, it would save me £400 a year! But my opinion has been a little skewed
I did try it yes I put it in the htacess I've not noticed any difference.
I also uncommented all the other things there relating to lscache but still, no change. Still won't cache properly, still won't purge. Still shows customer session data to others.